Sunday, August 14, 2005

Brokaw's Idea

Cross-posted slightly differently at Charging RINO.

I wanted to just chime in quickly today and recommend an op/ed from Tom Brokaw in Sunday's Washington Post. Drawing on his experiences reporting with American military personnel in Afghanistan, Brokaw suggests the creation of a 'Diplomatic Special Forces' corps, which he envisions as a kind of "Peace Corps plus."

The foreign service should "recruit young men and women who want an adventurous life ... and [p]ut them through crash courses in local dialects and skills relevant to the areas where they will be assigned. Place them in military outposts in remote areas, an arrangement that would have the added benefit of forging bonds between the military and the diplomatic corps. Give them extra pay and set the bar high so they have the same elite status as the Pentagon's Special Forces," Brokaw writes.

Besides providing a "different American face" to local civilians, these special forces would be able to take responsibility for some of the "nation-building" duties now handled by military personnel, assisting with the creation and re-creation of infrastructure - from schools to hospitals, etc. in various areas of the world.

While obviously there might be some logistical problems with Brokaw's approach, I think he's got an interesting concept. It is this kind of "outside the box" thinking that's got to be done at the very highest levels of government to devise new ways for Americans to see and be seen around the world (the latter being more important). Slickly-produced television ad campaigns might reach more people, but I'd be willing to bet that face-to-face contact would be far more impactful.

If nothing else, Brokaw has started a healthy discussion. I'd like to see it continued.

In a comment to this post at Charging RINO, Wilderwood noted that "crash courses" in preparing young Americans to deal with other cultures will not lead to real understanding of other cultures. I agree that crash courses alone are insufficient ... but combined with a period of exposure to different peoples and ways of life, this would certainly be better than nothing. And obviously this plan is nothing formal, but a springboard for further thoughts and debate. A debate the country could certainly stand to have.

4 Comments:

At 1:46 PM, Anonymous Charles Amico said...

Browkaw's idea has merit and appeal to me. Besides the obvious training and culture submersion that is necessary, there is a need for some type of screening of the people that would be these diplomats. They would need to be conscious and, as much as possible, ego free. Enlightened individuals are in every culture but they are few and far in between. Diplomats are often appointed by unenlightened leaders. Even lower level diplomatic enlightened souls would be a good start but those that nominate or appoint the individuals are usually the problem, and not the solution. It is a difficult problem but worthy of much thought.

 
At 4:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It sounds like a good way to surrender a lot of hostages to the Islamofascists to bargain with.

 
At 10:56 PM, Anonymous KILROY said...

I may be a little older than you folks, but are we not discussing the "Peace Corps" concept. The actual focus may be top down as opposed to bottom up, but, Is it not the same concept with a slightly different mission statement?

 
At 11:35 AM, Blogger Tom Strong said...

It does seem a lot like the Peace Corps to me as well. However, it could be possible to cast this as a certain subsection of the Peace Corps that deals more directly with social planning and the development of infrastructure.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home