Wednesday, August 03, 2005

The Route to (Centrist) Paradise

Just a brief note to follow up on Jonathan's excellent post from earlier on the need for centrist interest groups and organization. I fully agree, and wanted to just mention one such group that has recently formed. It's in the foreign policy arena, where I tend to think bipartisanship and centrist principles generally have an easier time taking root than on domestic issues (at least in the past), but it's certainly worthy of some mention and discussion.

The Partnership for a Secure America is scheduled to officially kick off operations this week, with stated goals of heightening "public awareness of and support for a bipartisan national security and foreign policy," bringing "leading Democrats and Republicans together to seek common ground in national security and foreign policy," and accomplishing "the above tasks through the use of the most effective tools of modern communications." Its founders are former Clinton national security aide Jamie Metzl and Chip Andreae, former chief of staff to Senator Richard Lugar. The 23-member board reads like a who's who of the foreign policy center: Warren Rudman, John Danforth, Gary Hart, William Perry, Madeline Albright, Tom Kean, William Weld, Lee Hamilton ... the list goes on; you can find all the names here, in an article on the effort from The Hill.

In an online petition (signable), the PSA outlines its major beliefs, and its objectives for bipartisan cooperation on foreign policy, and includes a list of major areas where cooperation and conensus could go a long way toward improving not only our own security, but the overall stability and security of the world community. They ask at the top "Why are we pulling apart when we need to pull together? Sixty years ago, a great generation of Americans came together to build a better world from the ashes of war. Republicans and Democrats cooperated in supporting a bipartisan foreign policy to protect the American people against a powerful, long-term threat to our national security. Today, a new long-term global peril faces our country. But growing partisan bitterness is derailing substantive discussion and vigorous debate on national security issues."

Take that last sentence, remove "national security," and fill in the blank. As Jonathan notes below, the problem of partisan bitterness is by no means exclusive to national security issues. But I have to tip my hat to those responsible for the formation of this group, and I hope that it's only the beginning. How long will it be until we see the rise of a Partnership for a Fiscally Secure America, or the Partnership for an Energy Efficient America, or you name it?

Hopefully not very long. We've waited far too long already.


At 5:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

good post... thanks.

my site: free online iq test

At 5:28 PM, Blogger james86darlington said...

Pennsylvania Democrats don't vote for "Santorum Light" Bob Casey Jr.

If I described someone to you as being anti-choice and anti-embryonic stem cell research you'de say, "that's a republican, that's a conservative, that's the illogical religiously driven position that ideologs like Tom Delay and Sam Brownback take", but guess what these are just some of the adjectives you can use to describe Bob Casey Jr. the 'Democrat', running against Bin Laden's future roomate on Mars Rick Santorum. Vote for a real Democrat in 2006 one who will protect a woman's right to choose, and support goverment funding of Embryonic Stem Cell research.

Vote for Alan Sandals(, or Chuck Pennacchio (

Check out my blog or I'll eat you!

At 5:38 PM, Blogger Peter said...

Thanks for the post... I couldn't agree more with that organization. Hopefully it will flourish, encompass the domestic agenda, and produce political candidates to vote for.

At 5:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I love your blog! You did an excellent job! My website is about xbox360 cheat codes if you would like to come and give me a review!


Post a Comment

<< Home